8 hours ago
(Yesterday, 11:34 AM)Ell Prez Wrote: Ok, so if we don’t keep Tee, my point is WR is a massive need for this team. Contrary to what some here believe, you can’t just run scrubs out at wr and say Burrow makes them good. Show me where that has been done. Which wr was bad and then went to a top 3 QB and became a good player.
Maybe our WR 2 doesn’t need to be as good as Tee, but who are we replacing him with? Andre has proven he’s not a #2 wr. He’s a decent #3, not even a “good” #3.
Nice post Ell Prez. We all saw how Mahomes game fell off once he had WR's that couldn't catch the ball.
Doesn't matter how good of a QB you have if the Receivers have bad hands. Tee has reliable hands and is a big target for Burrow
and gives us another dimension that not many teams have. Like I said, I would be all for tagging and trading Tee, but we know what
we have in Tee as a player and we wouldn't know what we had in a Draft pick.
(11 hours ago)Frank Booth Wrote: bengals are always finding these 1 year prove it TE's. It worked with 2 out of the 3 times they tried it
nothing is stopping them from utilizing that strategy for WR this year if tee isnt playing in cincy in 2025
All for bringing back Gesicki and adding a TE especially if Tee leaves. But Ell Prez is right about our current WR's, we don't have an answer
for #2 if Tee is not here. We would have to use an early pick on a WR or a TE and I don't like being forced to pick a position early in any
Draft, let alone one with a weak WR class like this one.
