Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Vet or high draft pick to replace Hubbard?
#45
(03-06-2025, 04:33 PM)puddycat Wrote: Our need for DT depth is much greater than DE.  I would prefer an middle priced (less than 10M/yr.) experienced DT in a rotation and give Trey the money.  Paying a DE more than Trey is a horrible look. If the Bengals don't want dead money in the future they can at least pay Hendrickson a bonus for past performance.. whatever helps  them sleep I guess.
I'm also nervous about signing a player that puts the Bengals in a position to not develop/rotate younger DL players.  This is why if the Bengals pursue a DE I'd like to see one highly specialized who is expected to play limited snaps.
Whoever they sign should not be a player who makes them hesitate if BPA comes up DE or DT, especially because both positions should be on a rotation.

I'm looking Jarran Reed, Naquon Jones, Onwuzuike (or BJ Hill for less than 10M) at DT.
DE is very thin.  I could see a rent-a-wreck 1-2 year deal and a high draft pick.

Put Javon Hargrave in there as well. BTW, no way we are going to pay another End more than Trey BTW. Trey will be extended or traded.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Vet or high draft pick to replace Hubbard? - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 03-06-2025, 05:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)