01-11-2016, 12:29 PM
(01-11-2016, 12:08 PM)Who Dey Time Wrote: Both are equally devastating. But, in all honestly, the Vikings loss was worse.
Vikings led most of the game. Defense was dominant through 3 quarters. Then a fluke play sets up the Seahawks TD and a turnover by the Vikings best player allows them to take the lead. Then the obvious missed FG seals the shock.
The Bengals one stings for all the reasons that have been mentioned in this and other threads but I don't think we can claim that Cincinnati was a dominant team in their game for three and a half quarters like the Vikings were.
Interesting take. I agree, they did have he lead most of the game and they too had an extremely costly fumble. If AP can fumble at that time, then Hill can get a bit of an excuse, though I still think Hill's was worse since all game he wasn't running the way he ran on that fateful play. He should have had 2 hands on the ball since we were in FG range and we were under 2 minutes left. He didn't need a 10 yards, especially with it being 1st down.
