Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Bengals have a slightly worse roster than last season
#63
(03-12-2025, 10:21 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: The last time a player challenged the Bengals he ended up getting traded midseason. But, he was younger and staged a walk out. 

Trey can be mad and throw a temer tantrum, but he better stay professional if he wants another team to overpay the team for his services. Bengals own his contract. Bengals brought him in from Saints. He had 20 career sacks in 4 years. He missed 12 games his 2nd year in the league. Bengals gave him a huge raise and second contract.

Why are Bengals the bad guy if they choose to make a player honor his contract. Trey is not the first and won't be the last player forced to honor a deal.

But as I have said, find a team to give the Bengals a 1st and 3rd round pick and I think they would consider it. If he can't find that, maybe he is not as good as he thinks he is by other teas standards.

There is alot here that I'm not gonna touch because I just don't understand this line of thinking and it's not worth talking about. But the original point of being up in the are it seems as though there are some question marks. 
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: The Bengals have a slightly worse roster than last season - NUGDUKWE - 03-12-2025, 10:40 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)