Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Appears Becton not an option
#25
(03-13-2025, 02:12 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Well a lot on here put so much stock in PFF grades and Jenkins have been significantly higher than both Ford and Volson's.

Cannot just say, he was on the Bears and their OL sucked. Another reason to sign him is he is still young as you note.

Jenkins is a top 20 guard when healthy. PFF has him 18th of 135 and top 20 in both pass pro and run block. 

Volson? 78th out of 135. 52nd run block, 96th pass block. 

Ford, who played mostly at OT last year, graded out at 112/141 at OT. 121st at run block and  110th in pass block. 

Jenkins is a large upgrade to either. So is Scherff.
1
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Appears Becton not an option - Luvnit2 - 03-13-2025, 01:42 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - Luvnit2 - 03-13-2025, 01:56 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - Nepa - 03-13-2025, 02:02 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 03-13-2025, 02:50 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - Joelist - 03-13-2025, 02:53 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - Luvnit2 - 03-13-2025, 02:59 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - Luvnit2 - 03-13-2025, 03:07 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - Luvnit2 - 03-13-2025, 02:43 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - BenZoo2 - 03-13-2025, 02:44 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - Luvnit2 - 03-13-2025, 02:47 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - Joelist - 03-13-2025, 02:51 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - BenZoo2 - 03-13-2025, 03:18 PM
RE: Appears Becton not an option - Joelist - 03-13-2025, 03:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)