Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jenkins; Never a Realistic Option
#64
(Yesterday, 09:30 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: See, that irks me. We should be in on guys 9n 1 year deals. No long term risk. Zeitler, Jenkins, etc. 

Even with a Trey extension, I am still on a C/C- FA period. Bottom line is we kept most of our important FA's (except Hilton) but have not done much to actually get better. A no significant upgrade at guard + losing Hilton & ADG at least cancels out Slaton/Perine/Burks. 

Cannot go higher than a C/C-.

Yeah this is about right but the Trey deal may be holding things up.  I think they'd prefer to concede a raise this year in order to not have a 3rd year or not much guaranteed if so.  The most important move they make now is not having Trey sit out 3 or 4 games knowing he can come back and just be tagged next year.  They're have some money to spend and more by cutting Moss but I could see Trey getting a 10M raise if they can stay out of a 3rd year. That's why our visitng guard is a 2-3M type. 
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Jenkins; Never a Realistic Option - jj22 - 03-17-2025, 01:29 PM
RE: Jenkins; Never a Realistic Option - phil413 - Yesterday, 09:59 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)