Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Think the refs were biased?
#34
The fix was in no doubt....the NFL gets ref crews to steer results of games that lead to best matchups rating and $$$ wise.

With that said, Marvin knows this and the players know this! They had both Shitsburgh and the refs beat all that had to happen is not turnover the ball (thanks J. Hill), and Burfict pull up from that hit and its GAME OVER!!

The no-call on the Gio hit is a grossly negligent non-call followed by the subsequent celebration by Stoolers players once again yet they call the Bengals "thugs" for doing the same thing. No call of Porter on the field mixing it up with Bengals players is a clear rule violation, and blatant carrying out of fraudulent umpiring steering outcomes of games. They call that  rule violation against porter, then A. Jones never reacts, and that penalty would of offset Burfict's penalty. Pitt would of had the ball still on their own 45 with twenty some seconds left, no timeouts, in the pouring rain. The refs gift wrapped that game to the Stoolers at the end, and to let an NFL Playoff game end like that questions the integrity and credibility of the NFL period!!
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Think the refs were biased? - Attackcat - 01-11-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - pally - 01-11-2016, 02:45 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - corpjet - 01-11-2016, 03:01 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - Joelist - 01-11-2016, 03:14 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - ShowMeUrTDs - 01-11-2016, 04:47 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - BengalB - 01-11-2016, 04:47 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - J24 - 01-11-2016, 06:46 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - Utts - 01-12-2016, 03:27 AM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - CJ2etc - 01-12-2016, 11:37 AM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - M.W. - 01-12-2016, 11:26 AM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - Housh - 01-12-2016, 01:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)