03-30-2025, 11:52 AM
(03-30-2025, 11:22 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: So, you think the team is/was better off without Trey's 18 sacks or whatever it was? At face value, I would like to think that you see your conundrum here. The only way that the team is better off without Trey, is IF they receive a couple of high picks for him, and then HITTING on those picks!
Personally, I prefer a proven product at the NFL level. Trey Hendrickson is, and has been getting it done. The team lost several very close games last season. They easily could have finished 11-6 or 12-5! Let's not act like the team is hot garbage.
I have repeatedly said this team played much better the last six games the last season.. And I would love to agree with you that it is remarkable that we lost some games by very close margins..But we lost....And the season before.. Yet .I dont know ..neither do you, what reformulation has to take place in an effort to improve ..If the Bengals can win and retaining players like Higgins and Trey help.. wonderful...But let us hope that paying these enormous salaries don't hamstring the team a couple of years down the road.....Some people love Skyline Chilli ..some people hate it...that's life and just a difference of opinion.
