Yesterday, 02:45 AM
(04-15-2025, 10:52 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Yes. We need at least 1 starter level guard. And I'd say 2 (1 draft, 1 FA).
as for Peters' comments, he has to say something nice about someone who is under contract. But NE stunk last year. He cannot turn water into wine.
Pretty much this. The guard fears are warranted and the only debate vs taking guard "early" is how bad the defense was for 2/3 of the year and there not likely being a BPA Guard/converted T at 17.
So, unless a slam dunk defensive BPA is there they should look to deal down a few for an extra 3rd. BPA will still likely be DE with the depth of that group, and you should end up with at least 1 guard in your first 4 picks in the top 3 rds. Then, go get that free agent guard you speak of. Depending on how well they do at LB or S you may have extra money to spend.
Lastly, don't underestimate the value of the time gap from rd 3 to 4. They can get on the phones and shop a day 3 pick for a below average to average starter grade vet that's now available from their team drafting a young guard and trying to save money.
