10 hours ago
(04-18-2025, 07:20 PM)Bengalstripes9 Wrote: Looks good to me!
Thanks.
(04-18-2025, 10:24 PM)Ess ex Johnson Wrote: I will disagree with our evaulation of Warren and im not a proponent of taking a TE that high, past 10 years TEs picked in top 20 have had average to marignal success with a top 20 pick.. outside of Bowers none of the others have lived up to their draft postion.
Cool, agree to disagree Essex. Tyler Warren is special and you heard it here first.
(04-19-2025, 01:08 PM)Nepa Wrote: I note that some prefer a defensive player (for obvious reason) or IOL (to protect Burrow) over Warren. But I'm with you, for the diverse skillset you outline (great pass and run blocker, TE, H-Back, Fullback, and WR). And you could add passer, since he was a high school QB and recruited by some teams to play that position. If the Bengals were to land Tyler Warren, then they should go for it on every 4th and 1, no matter where they are on the field. The opposition would have no idea what is coming with Warren in there.
You don't pass up on someone that skilled and unique -- not when he is also a high-quality individual and hard worker. You might trade that pick for more picks, since Warren would be coveted by other teams, but you don't pass on a sure thing like Warren.
But, as you also state, Warren is unlikely to actually be there.
Great post Nepa, forgot Warren played QB in High School. I think he would add another dimension to our Offense and make us much
more unpredictable which is maybe what we need most on Offense.
(04-19-2025, 08:31 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Noce draft, Nate. I use MDD a lot and Warren falls often. Donovan Jackson is often gettable at #49, too. I do not think either is likely, but I always nab them if there.
I do not think Sanker is starter ready. Though he is a good prospect. Do not like Mbow at all, though we do need IOL.
Surprised you don't like Sanker or Mbow. Think these guys fit our needs perfectly.
