Your 2025 Draft Grade: The Poll

[Luvnit2]

(8 hours ago)NUGDUKWE Wrote: I like Goodberry. He does a player rankings working with several other people. I like him because it's transparent as to how they come up with they're rankings and it can stick close and vary significantly from the consensus rankings. For instance of they're top 100 players 70 of them were picked in the top 100 of the draft. That shows they hit at a decent margin as to what the actual NFL views draft prospects. The Bengals didn't draft a single player from they're top 100 list. Now to be fair they take athletic testing and age seriously so that hurt Knight on age and Fairchild for not testing but these are all metrics that need to be used as you are essentially gambling on hitting on a prospect. 

Interestingly enough they had Stewart as they're 180th prospect. Considering he tested well (except not doing agility testing) and he's only 21 years old. That should speak to just how bad his tape, production and other game metrics were.

It appears someone you trust, I do not. Sorry, anyone who has Stewart ranked as 180 it is not reputable, I could care less how he came up with grade.

A 6th round grade on the most athletic DE in the 2025 draft, very poor in my humble opinion and I would not hang my hate on anything the dude says for ranking anyone based on thar grade.