8 hours ago
(8 hours ago)Luvnit2 Wrote: The Ravens and Eagles were loaded with number of picks and may not have done as well as some said they did.
KC took a risky injured OT from Ohio State. Simmons may be great, but if he does he will be the first OT in a long time to do great in the NFL.
Their second round pick also has some read flags.
I think our fans refuse to take a critical look at other team's drafts. We could have taken Simmons, how would you have graded it if Bengals took him?
The Steelers needing a QB, did not take one until round 6 or after like 10 QB's were drafted. Our fans woud be jimping off cliffs if we that glaring need at the most important position in football, had 2nd pick in the draft and did not address it until round 6. They can fix it by signing Rogers, but even if they do, didn't they just give Roger's agent the ability to jack up 1 year rental?
I think Cousins may even be a potential option for the Steelers as well. Just a poor QB class overall so not alot of strong options although I enjoy seeing them with QB trouble.
I would of loved a Simmons pick. There is a obvious risk with him coming off injury. But if he had stayed healthy and maintained his level of play he would've been a top 10 pick. Those guys don't fall to 17 often let alone pick 32.
Just speaking of KC and the Eagles alone they got extremely lucky. Both players have injuries they are recovering from but both are top 10 talent level.
