Yesterday, 02:37 PM
(Yesterday, 02:30 PM)ochocincos Wrote: I'll be interested to see how the 4 LBs would be used.
Would it be 4 in coverage, or would the 4th really primarily just be used for attacking the LOS?
I'm also interested to know what the 3 DL would be in the case they had 4 LBs out there.
We know Ossai played LB a lot in college, so I could see him getting kicked back there at times.
I wouldn't be opposed to seeing the team run predominant 3-4 looks either.
I've always liked 3-4 defenses.
Whatever it takes to win. Coach Golden leaving his top job at Notre Dame to return to Bengals is talking 3 LBs and sometimes 4 LB's. Mostly he is talking Tackling. Coach Golden said Bengals veterans and rookies better get ready for tackling practice, because his top priority is to get this team to tackle far better than they have the last few years. I'm sure Zac will still get his Nickle and Dime sets he loves, but Golden is gong to add a lot more Front 7 packages to the mix.
Let's talk Baltimore who Bengals play twice a year. If Jackson or Henry are in Bengals secondary, then Bengals have already been burned. You have to stuff some of those Jackson or Henry runs to win. Force Baltimore to pass. In a passing shoot out, I will take Burrow, Chase and Higgins to win. However in a running game, Baltimore wins. If Golden can build a D to stuff Jackson and Henry sometimes and not run wild on Bengals, that is the key. If it takes 3 or 4 LB's to do it, so be it.
1968 Bengal Fan
