6 hours ago
(6 hours ago)Sled21 Wrote: And I believe the Bengals are doing just that, and even offered him 12 million more than his contract said.
Of course they're doing that with him, because he's underpaid compared to his production. They don't and haven't done it with others when they perform worse. So they don't "live up to their end of the bargain" in every case.
If a player underperforms, they want money back or you get cut. The way it should be.
But they don't want to pay more (at least market more) when a player overperforms...because "you signed the contract!!".
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"Hope is not a strategy"
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
