Poll: I side with Trey, Bengals FO or neither
Trey is the man.
Bengals FO has a contract.
Neither, they both are wrong
[Show Results]
 
Note: This is a public poll, other users will be able to see what you voted for.
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none?
#8
(05-29-2025, 10:59 PM)QueenCity Wrote: I'm on the Bengals side... Trey and his agent have been botching deals for several years now. He should of hired an agent that was competent you can go look at who he reps and the players outside of Trey are not impressive.

From the Bengals point of view they've already given Trey life changing money and he continues to come back to the well year after year. He's hit the age where players fall of a cliff and is rejecting 28 million dollars. He has zero leverage and if he sits out he will be fined and will continue to get older.

Lastly Trey, agent, and the media seem to ignore the fact that he isn't great at the run. Also if we want to get really into the weeds 7.5 of his sacks came in two games last season. Also in 7 games he didn't even have a sack. 

This about sums up how I feel. Nice post.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none? - Mer - 05-29-2025, 11:32 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)