Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none?

[Sled21]

(05-29-2025, 10:17 PM)jj22 Wrote: Neither. They both are wrong. Bengals for not trading him and letting this linger, and Trey for always having a contract issue (even after extensions) and being on the verge of retirement. The act is old. 

Except the Bengals allowed him to seek a trade and no team wanted to pay him what he wants and give up a 1st round draft pick. That's not on the Bengals. 
I'd be more forgiving of Trey's stance if the Bengals were making him play out his contract as it was signed. Instead, they are offering him a 12 million dollar raise that they don't have to. He's become a greedy Primadonna.