Poll: I side with Trey, Bengals FO or neither
Trey is the man.
Bengals FO has a contract.
Neither, they both are wrong
[Show Results]
 
Note: This is a public poll, other users will be able to see what you voted for.
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none?
#19
(05-30-2025, 10:10 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Great, since the team has been rumored to have offered $28M, they're not that far apart. Seems like a middle ground of around $32M/per should be able to get the deal done.

They started and will always start is Trey at 15.8 million in 2025. So, Bengals if the report is true offered him 12.2 million for 2025, we have no idea if anything was offered longer term. 

I know you want Trey signed, but why should team give him 16.2 million or more than double his 2025 contract salary?

If he was offered 28 million and then also 30 to 32 million in years 2026 and 2027, that is a great offer by he Bengals who HAVE HIM UNDER CONTRACT.

I think your zest to overlook Trey's actions (going publc) and demands are tainting your opinion.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
 Please use 2025 free agency to fix the trenches, not the draft!!!!!!!!
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none? - Luvnit2 - 05-30-2025, 11:06 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)