Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none?

[*rfaulk34*]

(05-30-2025, 09:35 AM)Sled21 Wrote: Except the Bengals allowed him to seek a trade and no team wanted to pay him what he wants and give up a 1st round draft pick. That's not on the Bengals. 
I'd be more forgiving of Trey's stance if the Bengals were making him play out his contract as it was signed. Instead, they are offering him a 12 million dollar raise that they don't have to. He's become a greedy Primadonna.

Once again...you just don't get it.

If the Bengals set the price too high, on purpose, that IS on the Bengals. 

I don't know how many times i've typed it but the Bengals were asking for a price that they're not willing to pay Trey. They don't want him going somewhere else so they price him out of the trade market, knowing his only option is them. 

It's ridiculous.