Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none?

[Luvnit2]

(05-30-2025, 02:36 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Once again...you just don't get it.

If the Bengals set the price too high, on purpose, that IS on the Bengals. 

I don't know how many times i've typed it but the Bengals were asking for a price that they're not willing to pay Trey. They don't want him going somewhere else so they price him out of the trade market, knowing his only option is them. 

It's ridiculous. 

I could us the exact same reasoning. Trey priced himself out of being signed because he wanted a trade and a 3 or 4 year contract.

Yep, it is ridiculous Trey would do that.