Poll: I side with Trey, Bengals FO or neither
Trey is the man.
Bengals FO has a contract.
Neither, they both are wrong
[Show Results]
 
Note: This is a public poll, other users will be able to see what you voted for.
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none?
#31
(05-30-2025, 02:46 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I could us the exact same reasoning. Trey priced himself out of being signed because he wanted a trade and a 3 or 4 year contract.

Yep, it is ridiculous Trey would do that.

Team(s) were set to pay him. They just didn't want to give up what the Bengals were asking. 



[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
"Hope is not a strategy"

"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none? - rfaulk34 - 05-30-2025, 04:47 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)