Poll: I side with Trey, Bengals FO or neither
Trey is the man.
Bengals FO has a contract.
Neither, they both are wrong
[Show Results]
 
Note: This is a public poll, other users will be able to see what you voted for.
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none?
#47
(05-30-2025, 06:35 PM)Sled21 Wrote: Are you kidding? They signed him for 60 million. Then he wanted an extension, and they gave it to him. Then he wanted another extension even though he wasn't eligible for one. It's not like he's got 3 more years left on his contract. He can play this year at his contract rate, or accept the Bengals very generous offer of a 12 million dollar raise they don't have to offer and he makes 28 million. Then next year he can go where he wants and get paid whatever he can get. If they cave to him, guess what happens after this years crop of WR's get paid.... Chase and Higgins will all of a sudden have the same argument (Chase mostly) and say they are underpaid. Are we going to redo his deal too?

Why are you so gleeful about our favorite team allowing a guy whose a bonafide elite player at his position, a key, critical position at that, to simply walk down the road? Are you secretly rooting against the Bengals or something? Shocked
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
1
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none? - SunsetBengal - 05-30-2025, 07:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)