Poll: I side with Trey, Bengals FO or neither
Trey is the man.
Bengals FO has a contract.
Neither, they both are wrong
[Show Results]
 
Note: This is a public poll, other users will be able to see what you voted for.
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none?
#51
People say they aren't obligated to pay him. Fine. What they should be obligated to do is field a competent defense. If anyone thinks that happens as constructed without him, then you're kidding yourself.

Telling Trey to kick rocks is punting on the 2025 season. I can't accept that.

The clock is ticking on the prime years of the best player ever to wear stripes. Every year that they fail to put a team around Burrow that can go deep into the playoffs is an indictment on this ownership. Anyone really think that if they let him walk and the defense sucks that it won't be a huge point of emphasis among fans and in the media?

Trey might lose money, but the team will 100 percent be the scapegoat in this scenario.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none? - samhain - 05-30-2025, 09:50 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)