Whose side on you on? Trey, the Bengals or none?

[*rfaulk34*]

(Yesterday, 01:24 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Your post #31 to my post.

Luvnit2 Wrote:

I could us the exact same reasoning. Trey priced himself out of being signed because he wanted a trade and a 3 or 4 year contract.



Yep, it is ridiculous Trey would do that.


You responded

Team(s) were set to pay him. They just didn't want to give up what the Bengals were asking. 

So I asked for proof and you started the side step. Who are the multiple teams one more time? Or did you make them up?

I don't side step. Did you not read post #52?

"Russini reported other teams are willing to give Hendrickson a new contract, but she laid out how Cincy still holds all of the cards."
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25170490-nfl-gm-bengals-have-ridiculous-trey-hendrickson-asking-price-amid-nfl-trade-rumors            


https://www.google.com/search?q=are+multiple+teams+willing+to+give+trey+hendrickson+a+multi+year+contract%3F&oq=are+multiple+teams+willing+to+give+trey+hendrickson+a+multi+year+contract%3F&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTEzODE2ajBqNKgCALACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8


"Hendrickson explored the market before free agency and the NFL draft, and multiple teams initially showed interest in signing the 30-year-old to a long-term contract, but nothing materialized, according to ESPN’s Ben Baby."
https://nypost.com/2025/05/30/sports/trey-hendrickson-considering-drastic-options-in-bengals-contract-standoff/


Anything else i can clear up for you, or do you just want to keep coming at me with failed attempts of 'gotcha'?