01-13-2016, 01:36 PM
(01-01-2016, 11:52 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I get that you don't want a favorite compared to a hated, but the draft profiles are similar. To say the 2 are "not even close" may not speak to objectivity. I like Boehm and would love to take him later in the draft; however, using the terms stubby and powerful could easily describe either of the two.I'd like to take two. I like Boehm - and I agree with Royle that Bodine has not been strong at the point of attack. I think we could pick up Tuerk in the 3rd and Boehm in the 4th. I don't like any of our centers. Johnson is not a good backup. Boehm sounds intriguing for what he can do in the ground game and Tuerk is just an intriguing prospect that may be the best center in the long run.
That's why I'm taking a look at the longer more athletic Centers. Long and athletic cannot be used to describe Boehm or Bodine; however, stubby and powerful can. It's just you consider Boehm more powerful.