Yesterday, 04:09 PM
(Yesterday, 02:45 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Kind of silly, rfaulk.
Burrow played 10 games and was league average-ish in 2023 and the Bengals went 9-8.
Burrow played 17 games and put up MVP-like numbers in 2024 and the Bengals went 9-8.
Good players doing well still is better for your team and is a positive influence on W-L.
How does this dispute Trey Hendrickson doesn't have an effect on wins and losses year by year?
Where is the evidence that Trey does impact wins and losses year by year?
Do you think a QB has the same effect on wins and losses as an ED?
I've never argued against good players doing well still is better for your team. I want Trey on the team for just that reason and i stated that in an earlier post. I'm disputing that Trey is going to be the difference in 2 or more wins/losses every year by his presence on the field alone. I know Burrow makes a difference in multiple games every year. A one-off, minus context, doesn't disprove that. I gave context in my argument. Where's the evidence that Trey has the same impact?
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"Hope is not a strategy"
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
