07-25-2025, 08:12 PM
(07-25-2025, 08:07 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Probably, but you also have to keep in mind... Stewart is part of a union. You don't want to be the guy who accepts reduced terms in exchange for nothing, because then you've set the precedent that everyone after you should also accept reduced terms in exchange for nothing. Now the precedent is that in exchange for those terms being worse, you get more money.
Just look at how much more guaranteed money QBs have been getting since the Watson deal. It didn't give them fully guaranteed, but it sure as hell gave them a whole lot more. Every move like this is setting up you and others for the next move. Accepting a loss and getting nothing in return is how you start backsliding.
The early 2nd round picks this year getting fully guaranteed contracts have set it up for future early 2nd round picks. It also made it better for guys later down like Knight who got the most guaranteed for his pick. All about precedent.
Good post
All very true for players
The same goes for Bengals FO, they also wanted to get that language in this and future contracts. You can bet the language is also in other and maybe every contract now.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Please use 2025 free agency to fix the trenches, not the draft!!!!!!!!