Yesterday, 04:33 PM
(Yesterday, 04:17 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: I agree. But the question/comment I was responding to, was, the offense is "kick ass."
I interpret kick ass to be elite. Dominant. Elite scoring. You give us the ball under 4 min with a lead & you don't get it back. Tied & under 2 min and we win. Down 3 and under 2 min is OT. More than 2 and we most likely win. Not every time, obviously. But more often than not.
Good enough to make the PO's eith a better D? Or a couple made FG's? Yep.
Good enough to come up clutch when the chips are down & beat good teams? Sketchy at best.
With a little help they could be elite. A run game, better G play, and a TE who can block and catch and we are a PO team regardless of the D, and a threat to go deep in the POs.
TE pickins were slim, so I get bringing back Gesicki in FA. Most of the TEs in the draft were pass catchers primarily (Ferguson & the ND TE I liked more than Rivers/Carter). But fine.
But we could have done much better at guard.
The interest in Fant probes my point at TE. He isn't high end, but certainly a more diverse skill set than Sample, Grandy, Gesicki, & Hudson.
This offense is elite. I am not sure what on earth you are talking about. They were literally scoring at will last year.
![[Image: Screenshot-2022-02-02-154836.png]](https://i.ibb.co/db2LNsj/Screenshot-2022-02-02-154836.png)
The boys are just talkin' ball, babyyyy
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)