Yesterday, 04:39 PM
(Yesterday, 04:30 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Me, too. I think it was a pretty reasonable choice given that filling ALL the holes was unrealistic. FA pass rushing DT's were getting WAY more than they merited in FA (I would not have payed one). If we didn't love any of the Rd1 types in the draft, this solution was a decent one.
And while I hated the Stewart pick (too risky, likely needs a year), he does have a high ceiling and if he hits, he can help at DE and interior pass rush. Two birds with one stone. Which is always a tempting bet when you are trying to fill a lot of holes.
If Stewart can end up notching 6-8 sacks a year, help bolster the run defense, and have versatility to play base end and nickel DT, I can be happy with the pick.
I too was (am) worried he's a couple (or a few) years away from being overly impactful though.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. Ended 9-8 but barely missed playoffs
Changes needed to do better in Sept/Oct moving forward.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. Ended 9-8 but barely missed playoffs
Changes needed to do better in Sept/Oct moving forward.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)