Not a Catch

[TRsome]

(01-15-2016, 09:44 PM)GMDino Wrote: That is an interesting take you got for the article.

Let's look at what Blandino said though:





So he's saying it *may* not have been a catch but there wasn't enough evidence to say that.

A little different than the title of the thread.

Pretty clear what he thought about it in his first sentence. I read it basically as "I don't think it was a catch but I can see why the officials could make that mistake and not be able to fix it with replay."