Not a Catch

[GMDino]

(01-16-2016, 12:03 AM)TRsome Wrote: You're changing the argument.


Looks like if he was on the field, he would have called it a "no catch." Seems pretty clear to me.


But the ruling on the field said that it was a catch, contradicting his thoughts. And in order for that to be fixed, it needs to be obvious evidence that it's not a catch. So even though they couldn't correct it, it should not have been ruled a catch on the field, according to Blandino.


This seems pretty clear to me. Why are you trying to twist it?

Well, Blandino was NEVER on the field...his specialty is the technology not the rules.  That aside if says there isn't enough to overturn the call in real time then that means its a catch.  He's saying if HE was an official he would have said no catch...but upon review there's not enough there to make that statement true.

Did he comment on the quick whistle that cost the Steelers another TD?

Carry on.

EDIT:

I didn't realize this before when I was responding, so I apologize for getting caught up in this article.

Didn't anyone see who wrote it?!?!

Quote:Posted by Mike Florio on January 15, 2016, 5:26 PM EST

From what I have gathered around here he is an unabashed Steelers lover!!!
How can any Bengals fan take this story for what it is worth?!?!