Official Decision

[SteelCitySouth]

(01-20-2016, 06:00 PM)PV Bengal Wrote: As a typically ignorant Squealer fan, you're looking at the wrong thing.

The ref's blew the whistle because they thought Bernard was down by contact. He wasn't, of course, but it was a quick whistle.

What you are forgetting ... about the Shazier/Bernart hit ... is the following: Shazier had his helmet up, looked at Bernard, then lowered his helmet and hit him with the crown of the helmet. Per rule 12-2-8, this is a foul.

While I know that YOU believe that the hit was clean (because a Squealer initiated the hit), let me ask you the following question. I know you won't be truthful with your answer, but WTH.  

The question is this: In the first game of next year, under EXACTLY the same circumstances, Burfict hits Bell in EXACTLY the same manner. 

Will you scream at your TV when the refs DON'T call a penalty on Burfict? If you said "NO, I still would think it is a legal hit", then I know you're still as full of crap the Squealers.

As a typical Bengal fan you have no idea what you are talking about.  This is how completely ridiculous you are.

http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Good-luck-in-Denver?pid=157264#pid157264

Further more, you exemplify the idea that Bengal fans, and Cinci in general, are poorly educated as you were unable to identify the actual conversation I was having with the other Bengal fan who must have been educated elsewhere.  Maybe go back and actually spend some time reading the discussion and really delve into the comprehension part of reading.  As I have told my daughters over and over again.  It's great that you know all of those words in the sentence, and I am proud of you for that.  What I need you to do though is know what they all mean when they are put together.