Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mulligan Trade Mock
#3
milksheikh Wrote:Why would they do that when they can just get a QB with there 2nd pick and keep there 2nd round pick for some other use and not downgrade?

I don't see why they would.. But interesting choices.. I wouldn't mind picking Ramsey ... but I'd want to trade down and acquire more picks to around #5-7 pick and I think Ramsey could be available there.

By making the trade Hue can get a QB he is familiar with and build his team, and still have a 1st and 2nd round pick to use for other positional needs. so with the trade this is how it would work...

Browns get: McCarron, Bengals 1st and Bengals 2nd
Bengals get: Browns First and Browns 2nd

Ultimately allowing us to move up in both of the first 2 rounds.

C12Schleyer

[Image: 175fb1ebe161ecda7fb32824e3682755.jpg]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Mulligan Trade Mock - c12schleyer - 01-26-2016, 01:01 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - milksheikh - 01-26-2016, 01:44 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - c12schleyer - 01-26-2016, 01:47 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - c12schleyer - 01-26-2016, 02:11 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - Stormborn - 01-26-2016, 02:35 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - RoyleRedlegs - 01-26-2016, 03:11 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - c12schleyer - 01-26-2016, 03:37 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - RoyleRedlegs - 01-26-2016, 03:50 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - c12schleyer - 01-26-2016, 04:34 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - RoyleRedlegs - 01-26-2016, 04:41 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - c12schleyer - 01-26-2016, 06:22 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - RoyleRedlegs - 01-26-2016, 06:25 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - Goalpost - 01-26-2016, 02:50 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - c12schleyer - 01-26-2016, 03:39 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - NATI BENGALS - 01-26-2016, 06:55 PM
RE: Mulligan Trade Mock - c12schleyer - 01-26-2016, 07:13 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)