01-28-2016, 11:25 PM
(01-28-2016, 11:10 PM)BengalChris Wrote: Not justifying anything in the article, but given the history of the team since Mike Brown has owned it, it's kind of like "We'll believe it when we see it and until then we'll rank you in the not very likely category."
Well, if you go along those lines of reasoning, then you have to say the same thing about the train wreck in Washington since Dan Snyder has owned the team.
Hard to see any way the Redskins are more of a Super Bowl contender.
I'm also shocked that they think there will sooo many personnel changes on the team. Wow, 2 starters on offense are free agents. Man, how will the Bengals recover from that?
Sure, there are some pending guys on defense, but this team ALWAYS spends close to the cap bringing back their own players. I'm not sure how an analyst that covers the Bengals can't figure that a majority of the key starters will be back. EVEN if we lost every free agent, you sill have 9 starters returning on offense and 8 on defense (including the entire front 7.)
PLUS, this team has drafted very well to replace those guys if they do leave.
