Top 10 Reasons Why Hitler Lost WWII

[BFritz21]

(01-28-2016, 04:41 PM)Penn Wrote: Just curious if we are on the same page with something that most people might not think is not relevant to the conversation, but if we are on the same page we do see the relevance.

Most participating in this thread are referencing "Soviets" whereas you and I are referencing "Russians".  A lot of people just interpret these as the same but I don't.  I'll add most people that DON'T interpret these as the same thing will think we are wrong to say "Russian" instead of "Soviet" but I don't .

So the curiosity, do you just see it as the same thing or do you have a different reason to say "Russia"?  There really isn't anything wrong if you are just using them as synonyms but just curious if you make a distinction.

Just because I see Russia as alone in all this, whereas the Soviet Union would include the other republics that are closer to Germany, which Hitler might have been ok if he just invaded those, but he tried to go into Russia and get Moscow, which is when the cold got his army, which, as I noted, was not equipped to handle the winter or even a long conquest.

(01-28-2016, 06:48 PM)Harmening Wrote: That's racist.