01-31-2016, 11:44 AM
It's tough to compare Kelce and Eifert. Eifert is far better, and here's why. Look at what Kelce had behind him? Maclin...for 1 year. That's it. He has been the #1/2 option since he has started. The Bengals spread the ball around so much and actually have the talent at the WR spot to warrant it. Eifert is never going to be an 80-90 catch guy. He just isn't. Comparing him and not paying him because of those numbers is foolish.
Give me 5 extra TD's over 25 catches any day.
Give me 5 extra TD's over 25 catches any day.