02-05-2016, 02:57 PM
(02-05-2016, 02:42 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Multiple QBs, multiple RBs, multiple Olines, multiple defenses, multiple OCs, multiple DCs, multiple coaches.
One HC, one owner.
How hard is it to see where the logical conclusion comes from?
If a company has unsatisfactory results, they usually fire some employees and bring in new qualified candidates. If they continue failing to achieve desired results through multiple waves of employees, supervisors and equipment, they will surely start to look at the GM or whoever is in charge at the ground level.
It's the same concept with a football team. It's all about chain of command. I'm not sure why some make it so complicated. Coaches get fired in the NFL when they fail to achieve the desired results, which usually vary based on current expectations. For example, if a losing team continues to lose, the coach gets fired. If a winning team continually fails to progress through the playoffs, the coach often gets fired (see Schotty, Dungy, Mora, Fox, etc).
That's just how the NFL works. Now either you trust how the rest of the NFL operates, or you can trust the same Bengals' brass who have failed to win a single playoff game in a quarter century. That's not a tough choice for me.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
