02-10-2016, 02:35 PM
I'm going to get the percentages wrong, but the essence of what he said correct... I think:
Bill Polian was talking about GMs on the radio once, and broke it down like this:
Bad GM's hit on 50% of their day 1 and day 2 picks.
Average GM's hit on 55ish% of their day 1 and day 2 picks.
Good GM's hit on 60ish% of their day 1 and day 2 picks.
Great GM's hit on 66% of their day 1 and day 2 picks.
The meat of it was that the difference between a bad GM and a great GM isn't that much. Having more picks than everyone else seems like a good way to up your hits per draft.
Bill Polian was talking about GMs on the radio once, and broke it down like this:
Bad GM's hit on 50% of their day 1 and day 2 picks.
Average GM's hit on 55ish% of their day 1 and day 2 picks.
Good GM's hit on 60ish% of their day 1 and day 2 picks.
Great GM's hit on 66% of their day 1 and day 2 picks.
The meat of it was that the difference between a bad GM and a great GM isn't that much. Having more picks than everyone else seems like a good way to up your hits per draft.
