02-13-2016, 04:20 PM
(02-13-2016, 03:28 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Look, the only thing I care about with Chad is that he helped the Bengals win on the field.
There's no question that the Bengals were better off for having him. All the other talk is fluff.
Chad brought zero playoff victories to Cincinnati.
All current players and coaches seem to be held to this standard. Why the pass for Chad ?
Chad Johnson came to a Bengals team that was 4-12, won 68 (6.8 avg per yr) games in 10 years and took the Bengals to 2 playoff appearances and zero playoff wins with what some would say one the all time greatest QB's in history firing ball to him. He went to the playoffs in 20% of the years he played here.
Replaced by rookie WR with rookie QB throwing that came to a 4-12 team as well. Have won 52 (10.4 avg per yr) games in five years, going to the playoffs in all 5 seasons. Have gone to playoffs 100% of the years.
Loved watching Chad play but question whether he made Bengals a better team. When you showboat hard you must accept the criticism if you do not produce at days end.
Also was given the chance by New England to prove his worth on a SB caliber team and failed to deliver. Tom Brady disagrees with the love of Chad and have to give his opinion more weight.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
The water tastes funny when you're far from your home,
yet it's only the thirsty that hunger to roam.
Roam the Jungle !