02-18-2016, 12:29 PM
(02-16-2016, 05:13 PM)OrlandoBengal Wrote: I think you hit it on the head. We must remember that this is a business. Winning is important, but what is more important when you retire? Having been on a winning team, or an extra $7-10 million in the bank? You probably have better stories from a winning team, but that money means that you and your family should be set for life.
The "lifespan" of an NFL player is very short. These guys have to make the most of the opportunity while it exists and no one should blame them for doing so.
(02-16-2016, 09:37 PM)Nately120 Wrote: I'm not an NFL player so I don't know this for sure, but do you think the Cincinnati Bengals are brought up when players think of "taking less to go to a team that can get me a ring?" Serious question. Making the playoffs 5 years in a row and 6 of the last 7 years is great and all, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Bengals weren't mentioned as one of those championship destinations. Nor do I think Marvin Jones going to the LA Rams would be met with cries of "Well, there goes his chance to win a ring!" etc. Just saying. Maybe things change soon, though.
(02-16-2016, 10:09 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: I can't see us being a destination in that repect. Yeah, we win in the regular season, but if you've made your bank and now you want a ring before you hang up your cleats, 0-7 in thr playoffs can't be a selling point.
(02-17-2016, 04:44 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: OrlandoBengal said nothing about winning a super bowl though.
Honestly I've been a fan long enough to see the mood of players on crap teams and it's not good. Losing sucks and it's definitely hard on the players. So there's something to be said for being on a "winning team", whether or not the Bengals are viewed as Super Bowl contenders.
Money trumps everything though, for most players. If a bad team offers 7 million per and more guaranteed money (the reason we lost JJo) and the Bengals offer 5-6 and less guaranteed, say bye to MLJ.
(02-17-2016, 10:29 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: No, but Nately did as an aside tot he original topic, and that's who I was answering. It's an interesting question: is this a destination for those looking to win a championship? I cannot imagine it being so, but players may consider different critera than our playoff record.
Look. Nately was quoting and responding to something Orlando said, - and Orlando said nothing about Super Bowls. He said "winning team". Being a "winning team" doesn't require winning Super Bowls or even playoff games. That's why I said what I said. If a free agent is deciding between say...the Browns and Bengals - and the money is even - I think the Bengals are going to be the preferred destination every time because they're winning consistently and the Browns...are the Browns.
Are the Bengals viewed as a place to go to win championships? Probably not, but I don't think many teams are viewed that way except for New England and up til now, whichever team Peyton played for. There's no debating whether or not the Bengals are viewed as a "winning" team though, and I'm sure that's at least somewhat of a factor in the minds of free agents. Although - again - nothing trumps $$$.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
