02-18-2016, 12:40 PM
(02-18-2016, 08:03 AM)Bmoreblitz Wrote: I'm surprised this surfaced again. I mentioned it before.
I thought he paid her off though many years ago.
The University settled with her in 96.
Then Peyton wrote (very briefly) about it in a 2003 book.
She sued him for breaching the non-disclosure agreement.
Then she changed her story from, he mooned her (signed affidavit in 96 says no actual contact) 7 years later, she starts the teabag claim.
Peyton cannot comment on the story due to the non-disclosure agreement.
Basically, everyone is giving her the benefit of the doubt, which there is legitimate question as to which she deserves, for her interpretation of the events 7 years after it happened.
