02-28-2016, 05:25 AM
(02-26-2016, 09:12 AM)GMDino Wrote: Maybe because there was nothing to defend?
http://espn.go.com/blog/cincinnati-bengals/post/_/id/21196/giovani-bernard-ryan-shazier-dean-blandino-nfl-league-explanation-allowed-hit-tackle
So Harrison commented on one called a penalty he did not think should have been (after years of run in with the league over such hits) and did NOT comment on the one not called at all that was found to be legal.
Weird.
Funny you edited that down a little. You left out the part where Blandino says "That the Shazier hit is the the type of hit the league wants to remove from the game though."
Why would the league want legal hits out of the game? Come one dude, I know you have this new troll persona on this board versus the having some common sense on the old board, but be unbiased and think...if the hit is not illegal, why would the league want to remove it?
![[Image: bengals08-1-800small.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/MRz4cC9/bengals08-1-800small.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)