02-28-2016, 04:33 PM
(02-28-2016, 12:20 PM)Rhinocero23 Wrote: OK here is a breakdown (I rounded the numbers so it would not be such an eye chart)
2011 - Rollover = $15m. Used $109m of $135m: $27m unspent
2012 - Rollover = 0. Used $116m of $120m: $4m unspent
2013 - Rollover = $8. Used $127m of $135m: $8m unspent
2014 - Rollover = $9m. Used $132m of $142m: $10m unspent
2015 - Rollover = $9m. Used $144m of $152M: $8m unspent
Trying to understand these numbers. So the "of x" includes the rollover right? Like the cap was $120m in 2011 but you listed $135m because of the $15m rollover. Makes sense so far. And then we only spent $109m so that left $27m ($26m? but maybe with rounding it was $27m). OK. So why do you way there was no rollover for 2012 then? It should be $27m (or at least $10m if that is the rollover cap?) and the 2012 cap should be listed as $147m (or at least $130m?).
Which actually makes the team look worse, but I'm just trying to figure this stuff out. Was there a cap of $10m you could rollover? Was that a rule in addition to needing to spend 90% of cap with the 4 year rolling average?
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)