03-02-2016, 08:14 AM
(03-02-2016, 04:10 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: No they're not. That's goofy to even think that they are equally to blame. One won the game, and the other fumbled it away. The fumble doesn't happen and the game's over, and the penalty never has a chance to happen.
Without Burfict, the Bengals get crushed in the playoffs and it's not even close.
Without Hill, the Bengals probably win regardless when Rex Burkhead in the 4th quarter (like any RB with half a brain) holds onto the ball with both hands and runs the clock out.
I don't know where those "couple" of momentum boosting runs came from. He had the one run for 38 yards. Other than that, he had 11 carries for 12 yards. The Bengals could have played that entire game without Hill and had been just fine.
And truth
Thanks ExtraRadiohead for the great sig