Bengals Re-Sign....

[Benton]

(03-04-2016, 03:07 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: There is though. He's established bad. This is something they could do to attempt a minor upgrade on a more unknown but higher upside player. 
This team is virtually 100% risk-adverse. They stick with a bad player because they know him

I thought Mario Alford might when we drafted him. I think there's been picks over the last couples years they've looked at as possible Tate replacements, but that's never translated to anything on the field.