Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Steelers sign Ladarius Green
#16
(03-10-2016, 06:12 PM)Benton Wrote: Just surprised me. Seems like SD would've kept him around. As it is, they're going to have to look at replacing Gates sometime in the near future.
Was giving their #2 tight end, in an offense that pretty much only features 1 tight end, 4 year/$20 million really going to work for them?

I guess you can say they chose keeping an older Gates over a younger Green with a longer future, but can you blame them for not getting rid of Gates? Especially if the only reason to do so would be to avoiding having to find a starting tight end 3 years from now.

Do the Steelers want to lose Wheaton? No, but I doubt we even attempt to resign him. We resigned a much older DHB before he even became a FA. Some team will give Wheaton #2 money to be their #2 receiver. It's the same situation with the Chargers and their #2 TE. Older guy resigned and the younger guy goes somewhere with a bigger role for him in the offense.
[Image: Cz_eGI3UUAASnqC.jpg]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Steelers sign Ladarius Green - Griever - 03-10-2016, 09:55 AM
RE: Steelers sign Ladarius Green - Griever - 03-10-2016, 12:15 PM
RE: Steelers sign Ladarius Green - McC - 03-10-2016, 01:57 PM
RE: Steelers sign Ladarius Green - Griever - 03-10-2016, 03:07 PM
RE: Steelers sign Ladarius Green - Benton - 03-10-2016, 04:32 PM
RE: Steelers sign Ladarius Green - McC - 03-10-2016, 03:24 PM
RE: Steelers sign Ladarius Green - Benton - 03-10-2016, 04:41 PM
RE: Steelers sign Ladarius Green - Griever - 03-10-2016, 05:32 PM
RE: Steelers sign Ladarius Green - Benton - 03-10-2016, 06:12 PM
RE: Steelers sign Ladarius Green - 6andcounting - 03-10-2016, 07:10 PM
RE: Steelers sign Ladarius Green - CJD - 03-10-2016, 01:12 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)