03-13-2016, 04:58 PM
(03-13-2016, 02:06 PM)Beaker Wrote: BPA is BPA.
You don't take a WR 1st round to replace complimentary players due to a perceived "need". But if it lines up that WR at 24 is BPA and he's better by a good margin than players available at other positions then you take him. And you don't need two #1s. All that will cause is discontent. You only need someone good enough to be a threat on the opposite side of AJ to prevent double coverage on him.
Why not draft a guy like Michael Thomas in the 2nd or 3rd round? At 6'3" and 212 lbs....can you imagine him on one side at 6'3" and Green on the other at 6'4" in the red zone with Eifert?
Drafting a reciever in the first does not make him a number one necessarily. Let's also keep that in mind
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
