03-14-2016, 05:51 AM
(03-14-2016, 12:51 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: My argument that he raped her is based on her word, which, as I explained, it is understandable why she was confused.
My argument is that why would his bodyguards need to lead her back to him in the bathroom if she was willing?
Neither of those is circular reasoning.
Your argument that her word is true is based on the assumption that her word is true. That is the very definition of circular reasoning.
Your second point depends on the assumptions of the first, so it is likewise circular reasoning.
By no means am I saying that I can prove you wrong, but neither have you proven your case definitively right. You have yet to provide an argument that doesn't depend on simply assuming that you are right.
