Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post Combine Mock Version 1.0
#16
(03-15-2016, 08:07 AM)c12schleyer Wrote: I may have been the first one to mention the trade of McCarron to Cleveland. I mentioned it in a mock the week that Hue took the job. It may be unlikely, but it makes sense. For both teams. Maybe I should make a mock draft with the picks going in the assigned, sequential order... Since that is exactly how teams draft every year... Oh wait, it's not.

And we haven't drafted a 1st round DT in awhile, it doesn't mean we won't. If you could name a position of need (outside of WR, because I took care of that need in my draft also) that could also be BPA I would consider your argument.

The drudgery of reading this response was just as painful as I assumed it was going to be.  You offer no counter arguments other than... Well it could happen.  The same decision makers are making the picks this year and our chances of drafting a bad character guy in a non skill position in the first round is about as likely as the Browns giving us a 2nd round pick for a guy who could barely win with one of the best rosters in the NFL.  This mock is good enough... for me to poop on.
_____________________________________________________________________

[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Post Combine Mock Version 1.0 - pulses - 03-11-2016, 08:05 PM
RE: Post Combine Mock Version 1.0 - Okeana - 03-14-2016, 02:23 PM
RE: Post Combine Mock Version 1.0 - Okeana - 03-15-2016, 10:02 AM
RE: Post Combine Mock Version 1.0 - Okeana - 03-15-2016, 02:50 PM
RE: Post Combine Mock Version 1.0 - Okeana - 03-15-2016, 09:50 AM
RE: Post Combine Mock Version 1.0 - Okeana - 03-21-2016, 07:21 PM
RE: Post Combine Mock Version 1.0 - Okeana - 03-23-2016, 12:34 PM
RE: Post Combine Mock Version 1.0 - Okeana - 03-23-2016, 12:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)