03-21-2016, 10:23 AM
(03-21-2016, 01:36 AM)Bilbo Saggins Wrote: The real difference between the two is that Kirkpatrick had his chance and hasn't looked very good. People still hold out hope that Dennard could waltz onto the scene and look like a good starter. If Dennard had started over Kirkpatrick and had been targeted the second most in the league while only beating a scrub from NO and PIT in pff ratings, then yeah, Dennard would be getting skewered right now. The real difference is that Dennard hasn't had a chance where Kirkpatrick has proven himself to be a below average starter.
Imo the Kirkpatrick hate started before he even had significant playing time on the old forums. I remember people losing it over a pre-season game against Dallas.
