03-21-2016, 01:05 PM
(03-21-2016, 11:45 AM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: Yes. Because "not many" is not the same as "never". Wouldn't a lawyer understand that? 1 a year for the last 3 years....sounds like "not many" to me. Only you could would quote me actually saying "not many" and try to argue it means "never"
Lawyers look at what is called the "totality of the evidence". When you claimed that we would have the same team even after the draft there is really no other way to interpret that than you stating that we would not get any impact from any rookie.
And I love the wya you look at such a small window (last 3 years) in order to try and twist the facts to fit your argument yet you STILL FAIL because even going by the average of the last three years we ill have a major impact from a rookie. which clearly means the team will NOT be the same as last year.
